1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1964 Renault Dauphine is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 718 kg more than 1964 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 95 (176 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1956 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 95 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 632 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |
