1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1970 Renault 8
To start off, 1970 Renault 8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1970 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1970 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1970 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 95 | 8 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 38 L |
