1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1980 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 95 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |