1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1982 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1982 Fiat Argenta is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1956 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1982 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Austin | Fiat |
| Model | A 95 | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 35 L |
