1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1986 Lancia ECV
To start off, 1986 Lancia ECV is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 508 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Austin A 95. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1986 Lancia ECV | |
| Make | Austin | Lancia |
| Model | A 95 | ECV |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1757 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 600 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
