1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1998 BMW 316

To start off, 1998 BMW 316 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 BMW 316 (106 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1998 BMW 316.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 95 (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 316. (165 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1956 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Austin A 95 1998 BMW 316
Make Austin BMW
Model A 95 316
Year Released 1956 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2639 cc 1895 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 92 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 176 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79.4 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 83.5 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1350 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4220 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 55 L