1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1999 GMC EV1
To start off, 1999 GMC EV1 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 GMC EV1 weights approximately 544 kg more than 1956 Austin A 95.
Because 1956 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 GMC EV1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 95 (176 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 GMC EV1. (149 Nm). This means 1956 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 GMC EV1. 1999 GMC EV1 has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 GMC EV1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1999 GMC EV1 | |
| Make | Austin | GMC |
| Model | A 95 | EV1 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1894 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |
