1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Porsche Boxster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (335 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
Make | Austin | Porsche |
Model | A 95 | Boxster |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 335 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2420 mm |