1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 370 kg more than 1956 Austin A 95.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Austin A 95. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 95 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 95 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 95 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |