1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1956 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (339 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 95 | Express |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2402 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 117 L |