1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 310 kg more than 1956 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 95. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 95 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 64 L |