1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept
To start off, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 3,522 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (791 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 699 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept (800 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 624 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 95. (176 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 95.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2007 Dodge Charger RT Concept | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 95 | Charger RT Concept |
Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 3522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 791 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 800 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |