1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 37 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 1956 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Austin | Acura |
Model | A 95 | CSX |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |