1956 Austin A 95 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95.
Because 1956 Austin A 95 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 95. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 95 (176 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1956 Austin A 95 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 95 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 176 Nm | 153 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2685 mm |