1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1963 Mazda R 360 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Sports Convertible | R 360 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 23 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1770 mm |