1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1964 Lotus Elan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Lotus |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Elan |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2140 mm |
