1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1980 Renault 18
To start off, 1980 Renault 18 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1980 Renault 18. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 1980 Renault 18. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 425 kg more than 1980 Renault 18. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault 18. (136 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1980 Renault 18 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
| Model | Sports Convertible | 18 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1645 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1025 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
