1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford e-Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 242 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 190 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sports Convertible | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1758 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2730 mm |
