1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2003 Volvo S40
To start off, 2003 Volvo S40 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo S40 (161 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo S40 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo S40 (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2003 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
Model | Sports Convertible | S40 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2720 mm |