1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 142 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Sports Convertible | CTS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 343 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2890 mm |