1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 99 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (290 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
Model | Sports Convertible | Impala |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1549 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2810 mm |