1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 282 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 387 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 520 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4967 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1433 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2838 mm |
