1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Land Rover |
Model | Sports Convertible | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2891 mm |