1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,249 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (142 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1946 Buick 40 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Buick |
| Model | Tickford | 40 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5249 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1845 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3000 mm |
