1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1962 Holden EK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Holden |
Model | Tickford | EK |
Year Released | 1956 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 164 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |