1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1962 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 630 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Tickford | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1956 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2290 mm |