1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1965 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1965 Zastava 850 K is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1965 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Zastava |
Model | Tickford | 850 K |
Year Released | 1956 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2010 mm |