1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1966 Ferrari Dino
To start off, 1966 Ferrari Dino is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ferrari Dino (177 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ferrari Dino should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 490 kg more than 1966 Ferrari Dino.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ferrari Dino (188 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 1966 Ferrari Dino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1966 Ferrari Dino | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ferrari |
| Model | Tickford | Dino |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 188 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2350 mm |
