1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tickford | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2760 mm |
