1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1982 Opel Manta
To start off, 1982 Opel Manta is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Opel Manta. (91 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Manta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 530 kg more than 1982 Opel Manta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Manta. (143 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Manta.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1982 Opel Manta | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Opel |
Model | Tickford | Manta |
Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |