1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 1985 Renault Siete
To start off, 1985 Renault Siete is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1985 Renault Siete. (44 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 1985 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 715 kg more than 1985 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 1985 Renault Siete | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Tickford | Siete |
Year Released | 1956 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2540 mm |