1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Seville (301 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 215 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Cadillac Seville (400 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Cadillac |
Model | Tickford | Seville |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 400 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2900 mm |