1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 30 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tickford | Profile |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2880 mm |
