1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2000 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 607 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 607 (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 650 kg more than 2000 Peugeot 607.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 607 (386 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2000 Peugeot 607 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Peugeot |
| Model | Tickford | 607 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 386 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2710 mm |
