1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Ford 49
To start off, 2001 Ford 49 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,899 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford 49 (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford 49 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 232 kg more than 2001 Ford 49.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford 49. (175 Nm). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford 49.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Ford 49 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Tickford | 49 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2620 mm |
