1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon
To start off, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon (130 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 298 kg more than 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon. (183 Nm). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 Mazda Sport Wagon | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mazda |
Model | Tickford | Sport Wagon |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 183 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1232 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2630 mm |