1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2001 MG X20
To start off, 2001 MG X20 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 MG X20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 MG X20 (177 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 MG X20 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2001 MG X20 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | MG |
| Model | Tickford | X20 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 177 HP |
