1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2003 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2003 Fiat Palio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Palio. (70 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 625 kg more than 2003 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Fiat Palio. (95 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2003 Fiat Palio | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Fiat |
Model | Tickford | Palio |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2380 mm |