1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 3,931 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 181 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Lincoln |
Model | Tickford | LS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3931 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 388 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1711 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3030 mm |