1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 450 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
Model | Tickford | Tundra |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 3230 mm |