1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 440 kg more than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer (310 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tickford | Lancer |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2634 mm |