1956 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe
To start off, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 305 kg more than 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe (260 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Mini |
Model | Tickford | Cooper Coupe |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3734 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1684 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2466 mm |