1956 Austin Princess vs. 1973 Citroen SM
To start off, 1973 Citroen SM is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Citroen SM (180 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1956 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin Princess.
Because 1956 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin Princess (251 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Citroen SM. (233 Nm). This means 1956 Austin Princess will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin Princess | 1973 Citroen SM | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | Princess | SM |
Year Released | 1956 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2960 mm |