1956 Austin Princess vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1992 Jaguar XJS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1956 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin Princess | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Princess | XJS |
Year Released | 1956 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2600 mm |