1956 Austin Princess vs. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1956 Austin Princess. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin Princess weights approximately 619 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Because 1956 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin Princess. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1956 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: