1956 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (113 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 1956 Austin Princess is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin Princess. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin Princess | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Princess | 3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2639 mm |