1956 Bentley S1 vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Bentley S1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Bentley S1 would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Bentley S1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Bentley S1 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Bentley S1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Bentley S1 2009 Mazda Tribute
Make Bentley Mazda
Model S1 Tribute
Year Released 1956 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4887 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 171 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1725 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2630 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]