1956 BMW 502 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2003 Caterham 7 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 BMW 502 weights approximately 926 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | 502 | 7 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2230 mm |