1956 BMW 502 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero (118 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 BMW 502 weights approximately 206 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | 502 | Pajero |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |