1956 BMW 502 vs. 2006 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Toyota Celica is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Celica (141 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1956 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1956 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 BMW 502 weights approximately 241 kg more than 2006 Toyota Celica.
Because 1956 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 BMW 502 | 2006 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 502 | Celica |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |